سعر Uni

$GRVT Optimism is expanding its role as the operator of Ethereum-based chains for other brands. Unichain, Uniswap Labs' Ethereum layer-2 chain, plans to transfer its production sequencing, public node access, monitoring and incident response to Optimism under its October 9 migration announcement. The planned testnet move on Oct. 13 and mainnet move on Oct. 29 extend the operating strategy set out by Jing Wang in Optimism's Ink announcement: product teams build their applications and ecosystems while Optimism runs the infrastructure beneath them. Soneium's September agreement follows the same division of labor as Ink's earlier June plan; both chains use the OP Stack. For users, the consequence reaches beyond who answers an outage call. A common provider can bring protocol expertise and coordinated maintenance, but it also becomes a common organizational dependency. Each chain's deployed contracts determine whether users can get a transaction included and recover funds during a provider failure. Unichain moves from support toward operations Unichain already had an OP Enterprise relationship. Optimism's enterprise introduction, in its version updated July 31, says Uniswap Labs operates Unichain with the Mission Critical add-on. Read alongside the October announcement, the change is an expansion from support into responsibility for production operations. Uniswap Labs says the migration preserves the chain ID, contracts, balances, applications and Uniswap v2, v3 and v4 deployments. It also says Unichain remains a Stage 1 rollup with permissionless fault proofs and its existing contract-upgrade governance. The production operator changes while the chain and its upgrade authorities remain in place. Soneium's Sept. 30 announcement assigns the Optimism Foundation and OP Labs support for deployment, sequencer operations, node infrastructure, upgrades, monitoring and incident response. Soneium keeps its roadmap and engineering involvement, including ongoing work on the chain itself and its Tokenized IP products. The announcement does not specify a cutover date. Ink offers an earlier version of the same strategy. In her June 23 announcement, Wang described an arrangement in which the Ink Foundation could concentrate on ecosystem growth while Optimism operated and improved the network. The plan targeted an August cutover and included mainnet and testnet sequencers, RPC, the explorer, monitoring and incident response. A later Optimism guide published Sept. 7 describes Ink's infrastructure as operated by the Foundation through OP Labs. The reliability promise has an operational price OP Enterprise is Optimism's chain infrastructure and support service. Its tier definitions explain why the operating model matters. Under Self Managed, the customer runs the infrastructure and controls its sequencer and nodes; Optimism supplies support and monitoring. Under Fully Managed, OP Labs runs the sequencer, batcher, proposer and chain infrastructure, and handles security patching. Those components perform different jobs. The sequencer orders transactions, the batcher submits transaction data to Ethereum, and the proposer submits claims about the resulting chain state. Moving those day-to-day roles to the protocol developer can reduce the work a partner coordinates internally. Sequencing, data submission and state proposals become provider responsibilities; Ethereum settlement and the contracts that accept proofs remain separate. Soneium's agreement promises a 99.9% monthly uptime target and around-the-clock on-call incident response. The Mission Critical add-on advertises a 99.95% uptime SLA, a 15-minute initial response to the most serious incidents and status updates every 30 minutes. Unichain's earlier relationship explicitly included that add-on. These are service commitments, not measured improvements in uptime. The 15-minute target covers an initial response; recovery can take longer. The rationale is a direct organizational path between operating a chain, identifying a protocol problem and applying a patch. The trade-off is that distinct branded chains increasingly rely on the same organization for sequencing, maintenance and incident handling. A provider-wide process problem could affect several customers. The announcements establish a shared operator but do not disclose whether cloud regions, signing keys or other infrastructure are shared, so correlated technical failures remain a possibility rather than an observed outcome.

🚨 TOP 3 COINS TO WATCH — Market Momentum & Volume Analysis The market is showing mixed momentum, with DOS leading the three coins in percentage gains while HYPE and UNI are posting smaller positive moves. 🔥 1. DOS/USDT — Strongest Momentum 💰 Price: $0.2564 📈 Change: +10.42% 📊 24h Volume: 2.30M DOS is leading the group with a double-digit gain, indicating strong short-term momentum. If buying volume continues to increase, the move could extend. Watch for profit-taking after the sharp rise. 🟢 Bullish Signal: Sustained momentum with rising volume. 🔴 Risk: A rejection after the rapid rally could trigger a pullback. ⚡ 2. UNI/USDT — Steady Bullish Movement 💰 Price: $7.564 📈 Change: +1.35% 📊 24h Volume: 2.15M UNI is showing a modest positive move. A sustained increase in volume could help strengthen the bullish structure, but confirmation from price action is needed. 🟢 Bullish Signal: Follow-through buying with increasing volume. 🔴 Risk: Momentum may fade if buyers fail to maintain pressure. 🚀 3. HYPE/USDT — Gradual Recovery 💰 Price: $85.067 📈 Change: +0.93% 📊 24h Volume: 3.53M HYPE is trading slightly higher and has the largest reported 24-hour volume among these three coins. However, higher volume alone does not confirm bullish strength; the direction of buying and selling matters. 🟢 Bullish Signal: Strong follow-through above nearby resistance. 🔴 Risk: Rejection at resistance could lead to consolidation. 📊 Market Takeaway 🥇 DOS: Strongest percentage gain. 🥈 UNI: Moderate positive momentum. 🥉 HYPE: Highest reported trading volume. Key Point: DOS is leading in price performance, while HYPE leads in reported volume. Watch for sustained volume confirmation before treating any breakout as reliable. Not financial advice. Always do your own research. $HYPE $UNI $DOS

$GRVT The most popular blockchain networks and projects in the cryptocurrency market have been revealed based on weekly active user numbers. Solana ($SOL) topped the list with 15.9 million weekly active users, while $BNB Chain ($BNB) and Tron ($TRX) completed the top three spots. According to the shared data, Solana saw a 56.3% increase in weekly active users, reaching 15.9 million. $BNB Chain, in second place, rose 17.5% to 12.5 million active users, while Tron, despite a 12.4% decrease, remained in third place with 6.7 million users. The top 15 cryptocurrency networks and projects, ranked by weekly active users, are as follows: Solana ($SOL) – 15.9 million $BNB Chain ($BNB) – 12.5 million Tron ($TRX) – 6.7 million opBNB – 3.8 million World Mobile Chain (WMTX) – 3.2 million Bitcoin (BTC) – 2.6 million Ethereum (ETH) – 2.5 million Polygon (POL) – 1.9 million Uniswap (UNI) – 1.8 million Jito (JTO) – 1.5 million Base – 1.4 million Robinhood – 1.2 million Arbitrum One (ARB) – 1.2 million Litecoin (LTC) – 1.1 million PancakeSwap (CAKE) – 1.1 million Related News Allegations of a Massive Hack at One of the Largest Crypto Wallets—A Substantial Amount Stolen, CZ Issues a Warning Looking at weekly changes, Arbitrum One and Jito recorded the most notable increases, rising by 137.1% and 130.4% respectively. In contrast, Robinhood saw a 25.3% decrease, PancakeSwap a 21.2% decrease, and Ethereum a 15.7% decrease. On the other hand, growth on the Solana network wasn’t limited to weekly data alone. According to data shared by SolanaFloor and Blockworks, the number of unique daily active addresses on the network reached 1.88 million, the highest level in the last 13 months. *This is not investment advice.

$GRVT Since falling to a low of $7.00, Uniswap has exhibited upside momentum on the charts, closing at higher highs for two consecutive days. In doing so, the altcoin rose to a local high of $7.54 before a slight slip. At the time of writing, Uniswap was trading at around $7.52 after rising slightly by 1.26%. However, trading volume continued to decline, dropping by 47%. This hinted at reduced market activity as investors waited for a clear market direction across the board. Uniswap whale transfers $13.18 million in $UNI With Uniswap on its back foot, some whales may be choosing to exit too. According to Lookonchain, for instance, a trader withdrew 1.79 million $UNI, worth $13.18 million, from Venus Protocol and deposited it on Binance. The trader bought $UNI a year ago at an average price of $9. After the recent rally, these holdings saw significant gains. However, following the latest trend reversal, the trader’s holdings were sitting at a loss at press time. If sold at the press time levels, he would realize approximately $3 million in losses. The trader’s decision to make such a transfer could allude to a lack of confidence in the market. However, the transfer alone is not a confirmation that a sale occurred. Typically, selling by large holders increases the available supply and can add further downside pressure. Is the pressure cooling down? Despite the potential selling pressure from the trader, other investors, particularly in the spot market, appeared to have a different view of the market. While Uniswap traded below $8, traders continued to accumulate the altcoin. According to CryptoQuant’s Exchange Netflow data, the metric remained negative for three consecutive days and continued to fall. Over the past day, for example, the altcoin’s Exchange Netflow fell to a low of -624K. The declining Netflow suggested that more assets have recently left exchanges. Spot Taker CVD further seemed to support this observation. The altcoin’s Taker CVD remained positive over the past week, suggesting that buyers extended their dominance. Typically, sustained spot buying can absorb some of the selling pressure and help prevent further price declines. What’s next for $UNI? Although some buying activity has returned, the renewed demand has not been strong enough to trigger a trend reversal. At the time of writing, the market was still leaning bearish. For instance, Uniswap’s Relative Strength Index (RSI) remained in bearish territory at 46. At the same time, $UNI traded below the 20-day EMA and was testing the 50-day EMA. Holding below the short-term MA could hint at the prevailing pressure, but the 50-day EMA could sit as a strong support. The prevailing market conditions suggested that demand remains insufficient to trigger a notable rebound. This leaves the altcoin at a risk of further price drop or extended consolidation. Having said that, Uniswap is likely to hover between $7.1 and $7.5. On the other side, if demand strengthens enough, the altcoin could reclaim $8 and target $8.2.