Strike Kurs

For years I traded without a stop-loss. Here's why I stopped doing that 👇 My reasoning was simple: price almost always comes back above where your stop would have been. So why take the loss? Just wait. And it worked, kind of. My win rate looked amazing. It's easy to hit 100% if you never close a losing trade. 😅 But there was a hidden cost. Those losing trades just sat there, sometimes for weeks or months. My money was stuck in them, doing nothing, while new opportunities passed by. That's when it clicked: a stop-loss isn't about being wrong. It's the most important tool you have to protect your capital, so it's free and ready when the next opportunity comes. And there's always a next opportunity. This week is a good example. My bot bought a dip in STRK, the price kept falling, and the stop closed it at about -9%. Because the position was small, that was less than 1% of the portfolio. That same week two other dip trades closed at +5% and +9%. Small losses, capital always working, let the winners do the job. Compounding is key, and it only works if your money keeps moving. 📈 Do you use stops, or are you also sitting on a few "it'll come back" trades right now?

🐋 Top 20 privacy-related tokens to watch today 👀 🔥 $ZEC — $22.36B $XMR — $11.69B $NEAR — $6.89B $LTC — $4.78B $NIGHT — $692.2M $DASH — $665.9M $BDX — $576.1M $STRK — $435.3M $DCR — $270.6M $ZAMA — $206.1M $ZK — $161.5M $RAIL — $142.1M $H — $123.8M $ZEN — $116.5M $ROSE — $63.3M $ZANO — $62.1M $RLC — $61.5M $NOCK — $53.6M $ARX — $49.3M $ARRR — $47.0M Privacy Coins Have Evolved Far Beyond Bitcoin. $ZEC’s story began with a simple ambition: bringing privacy to Bitcoin. Today, the privacy narrative has expanded into a much broader ecosystem spanning confidential transactions, zero-knowledge proofs, encrypted computation, and decentralized infrastructure. Over a decade later, privacy is no longer just about hiding transaction details. It is becoming a critical part of blockchain infrastructure, digital identity, and secure on-chain applications. I mapped how this sector has evolved since 2021, highlighting the major shifts, emerging technologies, and narratives shaping its future.

$GRVT Starknet’s community has voted in favor of exploring a path toward an independent, post-quantum Layer-1 blockchain—an idea that, if it eventually advances, would reduce the network’s dependence on Ethereum’s security and upgrade schedule. The non-binding governance poll closed on Thursday after running for seven days, drawing roughly 3,200 votes and backing the transition with 93.52% of voting power. StarkWare said it abstained so the decision could remain fully in the hands of the community. Key takeaways The latest vote is advisory, not a final switch: Starknet would still operate as an Ethereum Layer-2 until a separate binding governance decision is passed. StarkWare and the Starknet Foundation can now proceed with research and technical planning for an independent post-quantum L1. The proposal does not plan to introduce a new token; STRK would remain Starknet’s native asset. Existing Ethereum–Starknet bridges would remain open while research continues. StarkWare CEO Eli Ben-Sasson says a draft whitepaper is expected in November, with a goal of reaching quantum-resistant readiness by 2027. A community mandate for research, not an immediate migration The governance process matters because it clarifies what changes now—and what still requires additional approval. According to the closed poll on Starknet’s governance portal, the community broadly endorsed the concept of moving away from Ethereum-linked assumptions for long-term cryptographic resilience. While the vote signals strong alignment, it does not authorize the network to stop operating as an Ethereum Layer-2. StarkWare and the Starknet Foundation can use the outcome to develop deeper technical proposals and a whitepaper, but any actual transition to an independent L1 would require a separate, binding governance vote. What Starknet says the research will cover StarkWare and the Starknet Foundation have set up a working group to evaluate the transition and produce more detailed technical plans. The proposal text also lays out key principles intended to reduce uncertainty for stakeholders. Per the proposal, STRK would remain the native token, and there are no plans to create a new token. The same governance document also states that existing bridges between Starknet and Ethereum should stay open, which implies continuity for cross-chain access even as the network explores major architectural changes. Why Ethereum dependence is the pressure point StarkWare initially raised the transition idea on Oct. 8, pointing to concerns that Starknet’s security posture could be limited by how closely it remains tied to Ethereum’s timeline and upgrade roadmap. Even though Starknet uses hash-based STARK proofs and supports programmable accounts that can adapt to post-quantum signature schemes, the network’s bridge and data-availability dependencies still track Ethereum’s broader evolution. That distinction is central to the current push. The community is effectively approving an investigation into whether Starknet can meet post-quantum security goals without waiting for every relevant Ethereum upgrade to land on a schedule that StarkWare views as too slow. Link to StarkWare’s earlier quantum-resistance roadmap This governance vote follows earlier work from StarkWare aimed at preparing for quantum threats. In June, StarkWare introduced a three-phase quantum-resistance roadmap covering cryptographic upgrades, smart-contract migration, and adjustments for components dependent on Ethereum. StarkWare’s Quantum Hub also claims it has tested technology designed to withstand future quantum attacks, including a successful transaction processed on Starknet’s live network. However, StarkWare noted that the approach remains experimental and has not yet undergone a security audit—an important qualifier for anyone evaluating how close the network is to production-grade post-quantum deployment. Ben-Sasson has set a 2027 target for making Starknet quantum-resistant, ahead of Ethereum’s projected timeline. In commentary shared with Cointelegraph, he argued that Ethereum’s stated target of 2029 is too late and that deadlines frequently slip in practice. What to watch next for Starknet and investors The community’s approval now accelerates the most immediate deliverable: Starknet says it will begin drafting a whitepaper and hopes to publish a draft for public scrutiny in November. Readers should watch for the technical scope of the proposed independent L1, how Starknet plans to handle post-quantum cryptography across contracts and infrastructure, and whether subsequent—and binding—governance votes gain similar momentum once concrete migration trade-offs are on the table. This article was originally published as Starknet Voters Approve Research on Life Beyond Ethereum on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.

$GRVT Starknet’s community has voted overwhelmingly to explore turning the network into an independent, post-quantum layer-1 (L1) blockchain—an outcome that would mark a major strategic shift away from Ethereum, even though Starknet will continue operating as an Ethereum layer-2 for now. The non-binding governance poll, which ran for seven days and closed on Thursday, attracted around 3,200 votes and returned 93.52% of voting power in favor of the transition research. StarkWare said it abstained from voting so the decision would remain with the community. Key takeaways The community approved research into an independent post-quantum Starknet L1, with 93.52% of voting power supporting the proposal. The vote is non-binding; any actual move off Ethereum would require a separate, binding governance process. Starknet will continue to function as an Ethereum layer-2 while research and planning proceed. StarkWare and the Starknet Foundation can now develop technical proposals, including a public whitepaper draft expected in November. The proposal states that the STRK token would remain the network’s native token and that existing Starknet–Ethereum bridges would stay open. A community-backed push toward independence According to StarkWare, the poll recorded the highest participation in Starknet’s governance history. The governance vote is designed to authorize the next phase: research into what an independent post-quantum L1 could look like and how it would be implemented without compromising Starknet’s core capabilities. While the result signals strong consensus, it does not immediately change Starknet’s operating model. The transition proposal specifically allows StarkWare and the Starknet Foundation to begin work on an independent L1 research effort, but any real migration away from Ethereum would still need approval via a separate binding governance vote. What the proposal would and wouldn’t change The proposal text indicates that STRK would remain Starknet’s native token, and it does not call for creating a new token for a future L1. It also states that existing bridges between Starknet and Ethereum should remain open. Those details matter for investors and users because they shape continuity and liquidity expectations. Even if Starknet ultimately becomes independent, the governance framework suggests there would be no abrupt token redesign—and bridge access would continue to support interoperability during the transition period. Research roadmap: a whitepaper and a working group StarkWare and the Starknet Foundation have set up a working group to examine the proposed transition and develop more detailed technical plans. In an interview with Cointelegraph, StarkWare CEO Eli Ben-Sasson said the team is already preparing a whitepaper and hopes to release a draft for public scrutiny in November. The staged approach reflects the scale of the engineering challenge. Transitioning from an Ethereum layer-2 model to an independent post-quantum L1 involves not only protocol-level changes, but also the security posture of infrastructure that currently relies on Ethereum timelines and upgrades. Why post-quantum—and why now StarkWare initially raised the possibility of the transition on Oct. 8, citing concerns about reliance on Ethereum for key security-related infrastructure. Cointelegraph previously reported on that earlier discussion, noting that Starknet uses hash-based STARK proofs and supports programmable accounts that can, in principle, adopt post-quantum signatures. However, Starknet’s bridge and data availability infrastructure still depends on Ethereum’s upgrade path. The community’s vote comes amid broader preparation inside the StarkWare ecosystem for quantum resistance. In June, StarkWare introduced a three-phase quantum-resistance roadmap covering cryptographic upgrades, smart-contract migration, and changes to infrastructure that remains tied to Ethereum. StarkWare’s Quantum Hub says it has tested technology intended to withstand future quantum attacks, including processing a transaction on Starknet’s live network. However, it also describes the technology as experimental and notes it has not yet undergone a security audit—an important reminder that “tested” does not automatically mean “fully validated” for high-stakes deployments. Ben-Sasson has argued that timing matters. He set a target of 2027 to make Starknet quantum-resistant, positioning that goal ahead of Ethereum’s projected timeline. He also said Ethereum’s target of 2029 to become quantum-safe is too late because deadlines can slip. As Starknet moves from research approval to technical drafting, the key uncertainty is what the eventual binding governance vote will decide—and whether the migration plan can address both quantum-security and Ethereum-dependent infrastructure without introducing new trade-offs. Readers should watch for the November whitepaper draft and the working group’s next technical milestones, since those documents will likely determine how concrete this shift becomes and what risks the community will be asked to weigh. This article was originally published as Starknet Community Backs Research on Post-Ethereum, Quantum-Resistant Chain on Crypto Breaking News – your trusted source for crypto news, Bitcoin news, and blockchain updates.