Runeの‌価格

$GRVT THORChain technical co-founder Chad Barraford accused stablecoin issuer Tether of blacklisting the network’s USDt (USDT) vaults without explanation, then unfreezing them hours later. In a Friday X post, Barraford said that Tether had blacklisted THORChain vault addresses, freezing about a combined 1.45 million USDT in the network’s funds across four wallets. He reported about two hours later than trading would resume after the company unfroze all the addresses. “We don’t know why this choice was made and have had no comms with USDT before this action and are actively reaching out to have a conversation,” said Barraford before the addresses were unfrozen. “We hope that this was made in error / misunderstanding.” Cointelegraph reached out to Tether and THORChain for details on the incident, but did not receive an immediate response. Earlier this week, cross-border payments platform Conduit Technology filed a lawsuit against Tether, alleging that the stablecoin company froze $2.76 million worth of USDt in a wallet tied to an investigation launched by Brazilian authorities in 2024. Two Thai nationals also sued the stablecoin company in August for allegedly freezing $42.4 million in USDt after an alleged ”informal request” from US Homeland Security Investigations. Related: Cantor Fitzgerald faces Senate Democrat’s questions over Tether ties

🔍 黑客24小时内全额还钱：NEAR Intents 这场380万美元攻防课 ▸ 攻击利用 Omni 存取层与智能合约之间的逻辑漏洞，得手约 380 万美元，11 条链被迫暂停充提 ▸ NEAR Intents 公开点名攻击者并设下 48 小时最后通牒，不到 24 小时赃款经 KuCoin 与比特币桥全数返还 ▸ 风波还炸出行业争论：THORChain 坚持无许可网络不做选择性拦截，NEAR Intents 则认为开放不等于替赃款开绿灯 💡 链上追赃越来越靠"公开施压＋合规通道"的组合拳。但对普通用户，跨链桥永远是高危区，大额资金别长期躺在桥合约里，日常交互配一个带风险预警的钱包多一层把关。 #跨链安全 #NEAR #Web3

$RUNE is tightening inside a bullish pennant, with price compressing between converging trendlines. The structure remains constructive. I’m watching for a clean breakout and close above the upper trendline. If $RUNE reclaims that resistance with momentum, the next expansion leg could be just getting started.

$GRVT TL;DR THORChain rejected incorporating selective censorship mechanisms: the protocol cannot block individual transactions based on identity or history. The Litecoin pause highlights the difference between halting a chain for solvency reasons and censoring a specific operation on subjective grounds. Chad Barraford clarified that changes to the protocol require consensus from node operators, with no possibility of unilateral control by the founders. THORChain maintains a clear stance on one of the most sensitive debates in the crypto industry: the protocol does not allow blocking individual transactions, regardless of the origin of the funds involved. This was established in a public discussion that distinguishes between two very different types of intervention: temporarily pausing the entire network for technical reasons and selectively censoring a specific operation. One of the most recent examples was the Litecoin pause. A node operator detected unusual activity and a price discrepancy, which prompted the suspension of operations for approximately one hour. After verifying that no insolvency issue existed, another node resumed activity. This decision responded to an objective technical condition, not to the identity of the users involved or the history of the transferred funds. The Problem of Delegating Subjective Authority in THORChain The central argument against selective censorship points to an institutional risk: if THORChain can determine which transactions are acceptable, there must necessarily be someone responsible for defining exceptions, maintaining blocking lists and deciding when to intervene. For those who participated in the debate, this transforms open infrastructure into a system subject to discretionary decisions, exposed to external pressures and potentially captured by particular interests. Chad Barraford, a THORChain developer, dismissed having unilateral control over the protocol. As he explained, developers can propose changes and new features, but node operators must voluntarily adopt updates. Important decisions require consensus, making it technically impossible for a founder to activate a censorship mechanism on their own. A Matter of Principles The permissionless, KYC-free model is, for the team, part of THORChain’s core value proposition. The ability to perform swaps without creating an account or providing identity information is defended not only as a technical feature, but as a principle. It is also noted that KYC databases accumulate sensitive information that can generate additional privacy and security risks. On the other hand, version v3.21 is currently under testing on stagenet and included fixes related to churn, slashing and BFT signing. Zcash was awaiting the completion of a churn to enable its pool, and Monero is the next possible integration. Dynamic fees are already active for ShapeShift, Symbiosis and Edge Wallet, while the SwapKit revenue share remains delayed due to technical issues, with a proposal that contemplates distributing approximately 20% of the revenue generated by that flow.