X100の‌価格

$GRVT X 100 Global Governance Attack Drains Millions as Token Crashes 96% Another day, another hack in 2026. According to a myriad of onchain security alerts, the cryptocurrency project built around a three-seat governing Senate discovered just how dangerous instant democracy can become when attackers reportedly bought their way into two seats and promptly emptied millions from its treasury. X 100 Global, an Ethereum-based project, suffered a unique governance takeover on Oct. 24 that security firm Blockaid traced to a flash-loan operation extracting approximately $4.85 million in $USDT. Its X token subsequently collapsed more than 96%, leaving holders facing a market with virtually no liquidity. Attackers Bought Control and Emptied the Treasury The exploit targeted X 100 Global’s governance architecture rather than exploiting a conventional smart-contract coding error. Security firm Exvul explained the root cause in full detail. Attackers reportedly borrowed approximately 1.94 million $USDT through an Aave flash loan, purchased X tokens and registered helper contracts to occupy two of the project’s three Senate seats. Here’s the catch: Governance lacked voting snapshots, minimum holding periods and execution delays. That allowed the attackers to acquire voting power, approve malicious proposals and execute transactions almost immediately. One transaction transferred 400,000 X tokens from the project’s Freezer treasury into an attacker-controlled liquidity pool, returning approximately 36 $USDT to the treasury. The attackers subsequently extracted those tokens and sold them through a legitimate Uniswap V3 pool. $4.85 Million Extracted as Liquidity Disappears Blockaid, Exvul and several other onchain security teams and investigators reported transaction analysis identified approximately $4.85 million in $USDT proceeds alongside roughly 550,000 X tokens extracted across three transactions. Subsequent operations targeted additional Uniswap V3 liquidity positions. The market consequences were severe. X plunged from the $50-60 range to approximately $1.75, a decline exceeding 96%. Decentralized exchanged (DEX) trading data on Saturday showed certain liquidity measurements falling to just a few dollars, leaving meaningful sell orders vulnerable to extraordinary slippage. The project’s X token is having a difficult weekend. Image source: CMC DEX screener. Approximately 12.2 million X tokens reportedly remained in the Freezer during Blockaid’s latest cited update, when the incident was still described as ongoing. No immediate official project statement has been released at the time of writing (3 p.m. EST on 10/24). The central vulnerability was strikingly simple: A treasury governed by three seats apparently allowed outsiders to purchase a controlling majority and execute its decisions without waiting. The incident remains ongoing, and X 100 Global has yet to acknowledge the breach or issue a statement through its social media channels. This article will be updated if additional details come to light.

$YGG In their May 28 amended motion, the parties sought to vacate the consent order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(5), or alternatively lift its prospective provisions under Rule 60(b)(6). The CFTC said a review had exposed evidentiary weaknesses and inappropriate enforcement tactics, and that the complaint should not have been filed under its current standards. Enforcement Shift Falls Short Hellerstein ruled that the agency's revised approach, including policies following President Donald Trump's digital-assets executive order, represented a change in enforcement priorities rather than a significant change in law sufficient to reopen the judgment. He also found that the internal materials obtained after settlement concerned facts that already existed when Gemini agreed to settle. Later knowledge of those facts did not establish changed circumstances, and the parties had not shown how the later disclosure prejudiced them, he wrote. The judge rejected relief under Rule 60(b)(6) as well. Claims involving newly discovered evidence or misconduct belong under other provisions carrying a one-year deadline, he said; the catchall provision could not be used to bypass that limit. He also rejected the argument that regulatory pressure rendered Gemini's settlement involuntary, noting that it had counsel and expressly agreed to settle voluntarily. The original consent order concerned statements and omissions from roughly July through December 2017 during the CFTC's review of a proposed Bitcoin futures contract. The contract would settle against a price determined by Gemini's auction, making the auction's susceptibility to manipulation relevant to the regulator's review. The settlement found misleading statements or omissions concerning trading prefunding, self-trading safeguards, fee rebates and trading volume. Gemini entered the settlement without admitting or denying the allegations or findings, except as to jurisdiction and venue. Hellerstein directed the clerk to terminate the two motions. He also noted that the CFTC remains free to account for its current policies when deciding whether to seek enforcement of the consent order. By creating vesting positions, releasing a large one, donating tokens back, and then canceling a topped-up position, the attacker produced a tiny leftover position that could withdraw tokens backing other users’ deposits. No private keys were compromised; the contract’s own bookkeeping enabled the drain. Scope and Containment Across Four Chains Blockaid put losses at roughly $969,000 on $BNB Smart Chain, $242,000 on Ethereum, $169,000 on Robinhood Chain, and $114,000 on Base, across 11 drain transactions that included copycats and MEV bots. UNCX said the incident involves 10 tokens: pepecoin, EDGEN, ZC, X, LO0P, and PAAL on Ethereum; IMO on Base; BTCLE on $BNB Chain; and CASHCAT and RKST on Robinhood Chain. UNCX said its liquidity lockers and legacy vesting contracts remain unaffected. To contain the exploit it raised flat fees above 1,000 ETH per new lock, removed paths that bypassed fees, and lifted token fees to the 5% contract maximum. About $3.25 million was still in the affected Ethereum contract when Blockaid identified the attack. What Happens Next No funds have been returned by the original attacker or copycats on any chain, UNCX said, and it advised against trading in affected pools until the respective token teams issue guidance. A comprehensive incident report covering technical findings, financials, and a proposed recovery plan is expected this week. The incident is the latest reminder that shared smart contracts, including token vesting infrastructure, can be drained without a wallet being breached, a risk examined in wider blockchain security coverage.

I loose $750 on $RAVE $rDASH $X $major and others . Cypto market is really bad!

🩵 THE XRP COIN MEGA AIRDROP ON BITGET IS LIVE! 👉 I joined the airdrop with 1000 xrp Coins and received 3000 XRP Coins in rewards! 👇The rewards were credited instantly, and you can see below my rewards👇$XRP $SKYAI $VELVET