Apple’s CXMT request tests US restrictions on Chinese chipmakers
Apple is reportedly requesting approval from the White House to buy memory chips produced by ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT). The Pentagon lists this firm among the military-linked companies from foreign nations, which means that Apple will have quite a hard time closing this deal. Apple needs to make this request because the increasing cost of memory powered by AI has started putting quite a lot of strain on the profitability margins of the company’s hardware offerings.
Not only does Apple’s request show us that the AI revolution has changed the way semiconductors around the globe operate, but it also proves that hyperscale cloud service providers (which, of course, are data centers) compete with each other for getting their hands on scarce amounts of DRAM and NAND flash memory made either in North America or Asia. This implies that large corporations like Apple now have to take into account both the increases in the price of obtaining parts and Washington’s restrictions regarding national security.
According to reports, Apple had reached out to the Commerce Department over a month ago to ask for permission to purchase memory chips from CXMT, which is China’s largest producer of DRAM chips.
CXMT is a “military Chinese company” according to the U.S. Department of Defense, 1260H of the National Defense Authorization Act of June 2026. It is said that an inter-agency committee agreed to add CXMT to the list of companies in the Department of Commerce Entity List, with strict export license requirements for any goods, software, and technology manufactured in the U.S. However, there has been a delay in issuing the new Entity List because of extensive negotiations with China, Cryptopolitan reported previously.
AI demand is reshaping the memory market
Apple’s request is being made in an environment where AI infrastructure investment is generating one of the most vigorous upturns the memory sector has experienced in years. According to TrendForce, DRAM contract prices are expected to increase by 58% to 63% in Q2 2026, and enterprise SSD contract prices will also be on the rise by 48% to 53%, due to the rapid growth of demand from hyperscale AI data centres.
Apple indicated this has affected them too, since they have just increased the prices of iPad and MacBook products, stating they will no longer be able to absorb the increased costs of memory and storage, as reported by the BBC. The iPhone maker has hiked the prices of some laptops and tablets by almost 20%. The price of its basic console will go up by $100 (£75) to $499, while the price of a console with more memory will go up by $150 to $749. New prices will take effect from August.
Unlike logic chips, which are manufactured primarily at Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), global DRAM is dominated primarily by Samsung Electronics, SK Hynix, and Micron. Hence, there are not many choices available to customers. Because of the significantly greater DRAM and enterprise storage demands of AI servers, DRAM manufacturers shift to produce higher margins on server products and reduce supplies to makers of smartphones or PCs.
Micron states that AI servers have seen a considerable increase in memory capacity to enable the operation of larger language models and data-intensive workloads.
For Apple, gaining access to CXMT would not simply add another supplier—it would diversify procurement in one of the semiconductor industry’s most concentrated supply chains while potentially reducing exposure to rapidly rising contract prices.
A frozen blacklist complicates the picture
The Commerce Department’s Entity List has not been updated since October 2025—the longest gap in more than a decade, according to Philip Luck of the Center for Strategic and International Studies. Reuters separately reported that CXMT, DeepSeek and more than 100 other Chinese companies had completed the interagency review process but have not yet appeared on the published list.
The United States has not put any companies in the “Entity List” since October 2025. According to former Commerce Department official Kevin Kurland, this indicates that trade policy takes precedence over a very important national security tool.
According to Reuters, Undersecretary of Commerce Jeffrey Kessler has sought since late 2025 to avoid adding Chinese firms to the published Entity List while trade negotiations remain ongoing.
CXMT is not currently included in the published Entity List as of now and, unless the Department of Commerce issues an explicit authorization to Apple, it is possible for them to create new supply chains independent of Samsung, SK Hynix and Kioxia without violating any existing export controls.
Apple’s history with Chinese chipmakers
In 2022, Apple examined the option of purchasing NAND flash memory from Yangtze Memory Technologies Co. (YMTC) for use in its iPhones sold in China. However, the company dropped its plans after the Biden administration introduced stricter export controls, and U.S. lawmakers warned that the deal could have security implications for the international technology supply chain. Later on, the Commerce Department added YMTC to the Entity List to show how quickly geopolitical factors can change semiconductor sourcing strategies.
Washington’s actions will be a key indicator of how the administration will manage AI’s competitive advantages against national security restrictions. Should Apple gain approval, this would set a precedent for multiple U.S. technology firms struggling with AI-related memory shortages. More importantly, it will show the difference in outcomes from having the Pentagon classify a company as a military contractor versus the Commerce Department implementing export restrictions while Entity List changes are historically “frozen”. If Apple’s request is denied, Apple and other manufacturers of consumer electronics will remain under pressure to raise memory prices as investments into AI infrastructures become the largest consumer of global DRAM and NAND supply.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Delta Air Lines Lowers Profit Forecast as Fuel Cost Increase Outpaces Ticket Price Growth
Delta Air Lines lowers its annual profit forecast due to a $6 billion increase in fuel costs; sharply rising ticket prices test travelers’ willingness to pay. The company’s refinery business is expected to generate $700 million in profits to help offset the impact of fuel costs. Rajesh Kumar Singh, Reuters Chicago, October 9 – Delta Air Lines (DAL.N) lowered the midpoint of its annual profit forecast by nearly a quarter on Friday, as surging fuel costs offset the positive effects of strong travel demand and higher ticket prices. This downgrade highlights the increasingly severe challenges faced by U.S. airlines: if fuel prices remain high, will passengers be willing to accept further price hikes? Airlines have already increased ticket prices considerably this year, and analysts warn that further hikes could test travelers’ willingness to continue spending. The Atlanta-based airline expects its annual fuel spending to increase by about $6 billion compared to last year. Its third-quarter fuel expenses jumped 62% year-on-year to $4.1 billion, more than $500 million higher than July’s expectations. When asked about the reasons for the revised forecast, Delta CFO Erik Snell told reporters, “It’s entirely a fuel issue,” noting that crude oil and refined jet fuel prices have both increased since the summer. Delta now expects adjusted annual earnings per share of $5.10–$5.60, down from its July forecast of $6.50–$7.50. According to data from London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG), the new median of $5.35 is below analysts’ average forecast of $5.46. The company expects an adjusted pre-tax profit of $4.5 billion in 2026. According to LSEG, third-quarter adjusted earnings per share were $1.72, slightly below the average analyst forecast of $1.76. Its adjusted operating margin dropped from 11.1% to 9.4%. Delta is the first major U.S. airline to report third-quarter earnings; its competitors United Airlines (UAL.O), American Airlines (AAL.O), and Southwest Airlines (LUV.N) will release their results later this month. Ticket Price Increases According to the U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics, in the first eight months of 2026, U.S. airlines spent $42.9 billion on fuel for scheduled flights, nearly $13.2 billion more than in the previous year, despite a slight decrease in fuel consumption. Strong demand and limited seat growth have helped airlines pass higher fuel costs onto passengers. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Consumer Price Index, over the five months ending in August, average U.S. airfares increased about 25% year-on-year. With fuel prices remaining high and industry capacity growth set to further accelerate in the fourth quarter, analysts are closely watching whether airlines including Delta can raise ticket prices further without suppressing travel demand. Deutsche Bank analysts expect the industry’s proportion of fuel costs recouped through revenue to decline in the fourth quarter, with full recovery not expected until early 2027. Delta says demand remains strong. Snell noted that with fourth-quarter bookings already near 60%, the company expects revenue to increase by around 20% year-on-year. According to LSEG, Delta forecasts fourth-quarter adjusted earnings per share of $1.15–$1.65, with the median $1.40 roughly in line with analysts’ average expectation of $1.39. Refinery Advantage Delta holds an advantage over other major U.S. airlines: it owns a refinery near Philadelphia, which Snell expects will generate $700 million in profits this year. “We own a refinery, which gives us a hedge—part hedge—on fuel prices that no other airline has,” he said. Delta acquired the Monroe refinery in 2012, which processes crude oil into jet fuel and other products. While Delta must still pay market prices for fuel consumed by its airline operations, refinery profits remain within the company. When the price spread between crude oil and refined products widens, this helps offset fuel cost pressures for airlines sourcing externally. However, this protection depends on refinery margins; when margins fall, the refinery may also incur losses. Nevertheless, the refinery can only partially ease the impact of rising fuel prices. Even with an expected refinery benefit of 40 cents per gallon, Delta forecasts its fuel cost to rise from $3.61 per gallon in the third quarter to $4.25 per gallon in the fourth quarter. Snell said fuel costs are expected to remain high for some time. “Ultimately, fuel prices will come down. As to when, we’re not sure,” he said. (For the convenience of non-native English speakers, Reuters offers automated translations of its reports into several other languages. Due to possible errors or lack of context in automated translations, Reuters does not guarantee the accuracy of automated translation texts and provides them only for reader convenience. Reuters assumes no responsibility for any damages or losses from use of automated translation featur
SUI Price Pullback Sparks Debate: Correction or Next Buying Opportunity?
"SaaS Apocalypse" Debunked? Autodesk (ADSK.US) and Intuit (INTU.US) Lead Growth Against the Trend as Wall Street Reprices the "AI Eating Software" Narrative
This week, Autodesk and Intuit are expected to record their strongest weekly gains in months, defying pressure on the overall technology sector. This strong performance signals a renewed optimism in the market regarding the growth prospects of the SaaS (Software as a Service) industry.
Starlink Targets the US Mobile Communication Market, SpaceX (SPCX.US) Opens New Growth Opportunities: Wall Street Focuses on the Reshaping of the Telecom Industry Landscape
Combining the existing satellite capacity, SpaceX is supplementing its capabilities to upgrade from “occasional emergency connectivity” to “daily mobile service.” The satellite network provides wide-area coverage and fills ground blind spots, while low-frequency terrestrial networks improve connectivity inside buildings and in environments with complex obstructions. The two form a complement to each other.
