ROI - For the Trump-led Treasury, the "tail" of the auction is the most difficult part: McKeever
路透社2026/10/06 13:11The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author, Reuters columnist Jamie McGeever. Reuters, Orlando, Florida, October 6 – U.S. Treasury auctions are typically dull, predictable, and not newsworthy. But these are not ordinary times, and the Trump administration now faces the risk of sluggish U.S. debt sales making headlines. The U.S. Treasury plans to issue nearly $120 billion in Treasuries this week, the first non-bill bond sales in two weeks: $58 billion in three-year notes on Tuesday, $39 billion in ten-year notes on Wednesday, and $22 billion in thirty-year bonds on Thursday. These auctions would usually be insignificant events, but due to the exceptionally weak performance of auctions from September 22 to 24—especially the five-year note auction on September 23, which triggered the largest spike in bond yields since April last year—they are attracting growing attention. Since then, yields have not only failed to retreat but have surged across most tenors to multi-decade highs. It's worth noting that the possibility of a U.S. Treasury auction "failing" is almost zero. Primary dealers—currently 26 Wall Street banks and institutions authorized by the New York Fed as market makers for Treasuries—are always involved. They effectively underwrite the sales, ensuring the smooth operation of the $30 trillion U.S. Treasury market, the most liquid market in the world. This, in turn, allows the entire global financial system to function, given that trillions of dollars in global debt, assets, and market derivatives are benchmarked against U.S. Treasuries. Treasuries are also the primary collateral for lubricating the financial “pipes” of the U.S. and global markets, including repo agreements, interbank loans, and financing. In short, as long as U.S. Treasuries remain the pillar of the global financial system, there will always be buyers at Treasury auctions. The question, as always, is at what price these bonds will be sold. Currently, borrowing costs in the secondary market are at their highest levels since the mid-2000s, so it's reasonable to expect that the Treasury will pay relatively high rates in the primary market as well. But as recent auctions have shown, negative surprises remain possible. "Too big to be absorbed by the market"? The $70 billion five-year auction on September 23 was among the most worrisome in years. Demand, as measured by the bid-to-cover ratio, was at a nine-year low. The Treasury ended up selling the notes at a yield of 5.033%, more than 3 basis points above the market yield at the close of bidding. Three basis points might not sound like much, but it's exceptional for a five-year note auction. This is the largest so-called "tail" since June 2022. According to JPMorgan analysts, the last time a five-year auction had a three-basis-point tail was back in 2011—amid the brewing debt ceiling crisis that eventually led to a U.S. credit rating downgrade in August that year. Currently, concerns over the U.S.'s daunting fiscal outlook are driving up long-term borrowing costs. As a result, markets generally expect the Trump administration to gradually shift the Treasury’s massive funding needs toward the lower-yield (and therefore lower-cost) short- and medium-term segments of the curve. That's why the five-year note auction two weeks ago sparked such concern. A three-basis-point tail is common in long bond auctions, but not in the "belly" of the yield curve. If the Treasury is forced to pay a higher premium to issue these bonds, then Houston, we have a problem. A large auction tail can be caused by many factors, including market volatility on the day of the auction or more concerning, fundamental issues that may erode demand over time. The two are often hard to distinguish because they are not mutually exclusive. On a brighter note, this unease has not yet spread to the short end of the yield curve. At least, not yet. Three-year and ten-year Treasury yields are up about 50 basis points from the last auction a month ago, hovering around 4.96% and 5.32%, respectively. The thirty-year yield is up roughly 35 basis points to 5.65%. These levels should be high enough to attract strong demand and ensure smooth sales, right? Maybe. But if surprises do occur, volatility and uncertainty could spill over across the market. Investors will be watching developments as closely as hawks. (The views in this article are solely those of the author, a Reuters columnist.) Like this column? Check out Reuters' "Unhedged" (ROI), your essential new source for global finance commentary. Follow ROI on LinkedIn and X. You can also listen to the daily "Morning Bid" podcast on Apple, Spotify, or the Reuters app—subscribe for in-depth market and finance news, seven days a week. US 5-year auction has biggest 'tail' since 2022 https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/mkt/dwpkmkzogpm/TAIL.png (For the convenience of non-English speakers, Reuters provides automated translations of its reports
The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone, who is a Reuters columnist.
Jamie McGeever
Reuters Orlando, FL, October 6 - U.S. Treasury auctions are supposed to be dull, predictable, and generally not newsworthy. But these are not normal times, and the Trump administration now faces the risk that weak government bond sales could become front-page news.
The U.S. Treasury plans to issue nearly $120 billion worth of government bonds this week, marking the first auctions in two weeks outside of short-term Treasury bills: $58 billion in three-year notes on Tuesday, $39 billion in ten-year notes on Wednesday, and $22 billion in thirty-year bonds on Thursday.
These auctions would typically be insignificant under normal circumstances, but due to the exceptionally weak auction results between September 22 and 24—especially the five-year note auction on September 23—they are receiving increasing attention. That particular auction triggered the biggest surge in bond yields since April of last year. Since then, yields have not only failed to retreat but have instead soared to multi-decade highs across most maturities.
It is worth noting that the likelihood of a "failed" U.S. Treasury auction is virtually zero. Primary dealers—currently the 26 Wall Street banks and institutions authorized by the New York Fed—serve as market makers in the government bond market and will always participate. They essentially underwrite the sales, ensuring the smooth operation of the $30 trillion U.S. Treasury market—the world’s most liquid market.
This, in turn, keeps the entire global financial system functioning. Trillions of dollars in global debt, assets, and market derivatives are benchmarked against U.S. Treasuries. U.S. government bonds also serve as the collateral that "lubricates the pipes" of both the U.S. and global financial system—including repo agreements, interbank lending, and financing.
In short, as long as U.S. government bonds remain the linchpin of the global financial system, there will always be buyers at Treasury auctions. The perpetual question is at what price these bonds will eventually be sold. Currently, borrowing costs in the secondary market are at their highest levels since the mid-2000s, so it stands to reason that the Treasury will also have to pay higher rates in the primary market.
But as recent auctions have shown, there is always the possibility of unfavorable surprises.
“Too big for the market to absorb”?
The $70 billion five-year note auction on September 23 was one of the most concerning in recent years. Demand—as measured by the "bid-to-cover" ratio—was the lowest in nine years. The Treasury ultimately sold these bonds at a yield of 5.033%, more than three basis points above the market yield at the close of bidding.
Three basis points may not sound like much, but for a five-year note auction, this is rare. It was the largest such "tail" since June 2022. Analysts at JPMorgan noted that you’d have to go back to 2011 for a prior instance of a three-basis-point "tail" at a five-year auction—when a looming debt ceiling crisis ultimately led to a U.S. credit rating downgrade that August.
Looking to the present, concern about the dire U.S. fiscal outlook is pushing long-term borrowing costs higher. Therefore, there is broad market expectation that the Trump administration will gradually shift the Treasury’s massive funding needs toward the lower end of the yield curve—where costs are cheaper and maturities are shorter.
This is why the five-year note auction two weeks ago caused such alarm. A three-basis-point "tail" is common for long-maturity bond auctions but not for those in the so-called "belly" of the yield curve. If the Treasury is forced to pay much higher premiums to issue these bonds, then, Houston, we have a problem.
An unusually large auction "tail" can be caused by a variety of factors, including market volatility on the day of the auction, or, more worryingly, fundamental issues that could erode demand over time. These are often difficult to distinguish because they are not mutually exclusive.
On the brighter side, this anxiety has not yet spilled over into the short end of the curve—at least, not at this moment.
Three- and ten-year Treasury yields have risen about 50 basis points since the last auction a month ago, hovering at roughly 4.96% and 5.32%, respectively. The thirty-year yield has climbed about 35 basis points to 5.65%. These levels should be high enough to attract strong demand and ensure smooth sales, right?
Probably. But should unforeseen developments occur, volatility and uncertainty could ripple through the entire market. Investors will be watching developments as closely as hawks.
(The views expressed in this article are those of the author alone, who is a Reuters columnist.)
Enjoy this column? Visit Reuters' "ROI - Return on Investment," your indispensable new source for global financial commentary. Follow ROI on LinkedIn and X.
You can also listen to the "Morning Bid" daily podcast on Apple, Spotify, or the Reuters app. Subscribe to hear deep-dive discussions of major market and finance news by Reuters journalists, seven days a week.
(To assist non-English speakers, Reuters has automated the translation of its reports into several other languages. As automated translation may contain inaccuracies or lack desired context, Reuters makes no guarantees as to the accuracy of the automated translation and provides it purely for the reader’s convenience. Reuters accepts no liability for any harm or losses arising from the use of the automated translation.)
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Metals rise as oil steadies, yields pull back from 24-year highs - Kitco PM Report

This Is Why Bitcoin Treasury Companies Can Be Riskier Than BTC
XRPL surpasses Ethereum in tokenized commodity market cap with $2.2 billion inflow

Bessant Reiterates "Debt Reduction" Tune, Market Observers: Vision Is Not a Plan
U.S. Treasury Secretary Yellen stated that sustained GDP growth of over 3% would help lower the debt-to-GDP ratio. Market participants believe that with high deficits, economic growth alone cannot fundamentally resolve the issue. To achieve Yellen's goal of reducing the deficit to 3% of GDP, U.S. economic growth would need to reach 4.5%. Furthermore, the decision-making power over fiscal policy lies with Congress, not the Treasury Department.