Solana Community Votes on Proposal to Allocate 100% of Priority Fees to Validators
According to the official governance page, the Solana community has voted to approve a proposal to allocate 100% of priority fees to verifiers, replacing the current structure of 50% destruction and 50% reward. The vote, which ended at the end of 620 epochs with 51.17% stake participation, passed with 77.77% in favor. In previous news, tao-stones posted "Proposal to Enable Full Priority Fee Rewards to Verifiers on Solana Mainnet-beta" in the Solana Developer Forums, suggesting that the priority fee structure be adjusted so that 100% of the priority fees are rewarded to verifiers to ensure that verifiers have the proper incentives to prioritize the security and efficiency of the network. Discussion sponsor tao-stones indicated that implementation of this proposal would require the use of feature gating. While the payment structure for transaction submitters would not change, the software containing this proposal would allocate a larger percentage of fees to validators than previous versions. Thus, feature gating is critical to ensure a smooth transition to the new functionality for all validators at the epoch boundary, thus maintaining consensus.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
MetaMUI moves users to post-quantum security without asset transfers
Market Chatter: Apollo Considers Energos Infrastructure Sale at Over $3 Billion Valuation
Brinker International Targets Double-Digit Annual Adjusted EPS Growth Through Fiscal 2029
UK productivity has been "underestimated"! Growth rate since the financial crisis revised up to 1.3%, nearly double the previous record
A new methodology released by the UK's Office for National Statistics (ONS) on Thursday indicates that the country's productivity performance since the global financial crisis has been stronger than previously estimated, as statisticians found that working hours had been overestimated.