CFTC Chairman Clarifies Four Misconceptions About Perpetual Futures Contracts
BlockBeats News, June 16, Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Chairman Mike Selig published an article clarifying four misconceptions about perpetual futures contracts.
Myth of "Fixed Maturity Date": Some believe that the definition of a "futures contract" requires a fixed maturity or delivery date, and that the perpetual nature of the contract is inconsistent with congressional intent. Selig clarified that neither the Commodity Exchange Act nor CFTC regulations provide a specific definition of the term "futures contract," nor do they require a fixed maturity or delivery date. Since Congress has not defined the term, the criteria are provided by case law and Commission interpretation, neither of which require a fixed maturity date.
Myth of "High Leverage": Some believe that the CFTC approved the BTCPERP contract, which allows U.S. residents to use leverage of up to 250 times, violating its own rules. Selig clarified that extreme leverage has been a feature of trading on offshore venues since the inception of perpetual contracts, and is not inherent to the contract structure itself. CFTC-regulated perpetual contracts are subject to the same leverage limits as other CFTC-regulated futures contracts.
Myth of "Public Opinion": Some believe that the CFTC did not provide the industry with the opportunity to participate or express opinions. Selig clarified that in April 2025, the CFTC issued a request for comments on "perpetual contracts" and "24/7 trading," soliciting public feedback, receiving over 100 comments from a wide range of stakeholders, including many CFTC-regulated entities.
Myth of "Funding Rate": Some believe that the funding rate mechanism imposes a unique and prohibitively high cost on market participants, fostering market manipulation. Selig clarified that after considering the costs associated with holding dated futures contracts related to opening and rolling positions, the annualized cost of holding such a position is roughly equivalent to that of a perpetual contract. The funding rate mechanism is far from fostering malpractice but is a restraint tool to keep the contract in line with the underlying spot market.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Bank of Canada Issues Strongest Stagflation Warning: Tariffs May Push Q4 Growth Below 1%, High Oil Prices Intensify Inflation
Bank of Canada Governor Macklem stated on Monday that a new round of U.S. tariffs could halve Canada’s fourth-quarter economic growth, dropping it below 1%, while annual inflation will remain at 3%, exceeding the 2% target. He added that if oil prices continue to hover around $100 per barrel, prices could be pushed even higher. Macklem said that if inflation is manageable, he does not want to raise interest rates; however, if inflation exceeds expectations, he also does not want to react too slowly.
BNP Paribas gives Microsoft (MSFT.US) a "Buy" rating: Azure price increases will be gradually implemented after contract renewals, and a deal with SpaceX may be announced soon.
BNP Paribas has rated Microsoft as "Buy" with a target price of $549.
Iranian President will head to New York for UN meeting
"Big Short" Burry opens a position in QXO (QXO.US), betting on building products integration and undervaluation; stock price rises over 7%
Investor Michael Burry disclosed that he has purchased common and preferred shares of QXO (QXO.US), a building products company, citing its integration strategy and the currently depressed stock price. The stock surged 7.2% on Monday.
Crypto prices
More
